Past editorials
- 29(4-5), July 2019
(Farewell and thanks for all the reviews)
- 29(3), April 2019
(I love journal papers and you should too)
- 28(8), December 2018
(Why do people publish in facade journals?)
- 28(7), October 2018
(How can we recognize facade journals?)
- 28(6), August 2018
(What is a facade journal?)
- 28(5), July 2018
(What is the value of the peer-reviewing system?)
- 28(4), May 2018
(Why Don’t We Publish More TDD Papers?)
- 28(3), April 2018
(Proper References is a Matter of Scholarship, Ethics, and Courtesy)
- 28(2), March 2018
(Self-Plagiarism is Not a Thing)
- 28(1), January 2018
(Do We Need to Teach Ethics to PhD Students?)
- 27(8), December 2017
(Color Figures Considered Harmful)
- 27(7), October 2017
(Beware of Predatory Journals)
- 27(4-5), June 2017
(Is Paper Reviewing a Transaction, a Service, or an Opportunity?)
- 27(1), February 2017
(Accepting Shortened Papers Hurts Science)
- 26(8), December 2016
(The Downward Death Spiral Review Process)
- 26(7), October 2016
(How to Extend a Conference Paper to a Journal Paper)
- 26(5), July 2016
(Changes to STVR’s Editorial Board)
- 26(4), June 2016
(STVR Policy on Extending Conference Papers to Journal Submissions)
- 26(3), May 2016
(How to Write an Effective “Response to Reviewers” Letter)
- 26(2), March 2016
(How to Revise a Research Paper)
- 28(5), November 2015
(How the Web Resuscitated Evolutionary Design)
- 25(2), March 2015
(Who Is An Author?)
- 25(1), January 2015
(Plagiarism Is For Losers)
- 24(6), September 2014
(How to Get Your Paper Rejected from STVR)
- 24(4), June 2014
(Globalization—Logical Flow, Motivation, and Assumptions)
- 24(3), May 2014
(Globalization—Ethics and Plagiarism)
- 24(2), March 2014
(Globalization—Standards for Research Quality)
- 24(1), January 2014
(Globalization—References and Citations)
- 23(8), December 2013
(A Tribute to Mary Jean Harrold)
- 23(4), June 2013
(Globalization—Language and Dialects)
- 23(3), May 2013
(Effects of Globalization of Software Engineering)
- 23(2), March 2013
(What I've Learned from Usability)
- 23(1), February 2013
(How to Become an STVR Reviewer)
- 22(8), December 2012
(Flipping the Testing Classroom)
- 22(4), July 2012
(Status and Awards)
- 22(3), May 2012
(Non-Expert Reviews Considered Helpful)
- 22(2), March 2012
(Guest Authors Are Not Welcome)
- 22(1), January 2012
(The h-Index Beats the Impact Factor)
- 21(4), December 2011
(What is the Purpose of Publishing?)
- 21(3), September 2011
(ICST 2009 Special Issue)
- 21(2), March 2011
(Status of the journal)
- 20(4), November 2010
(Ethics and publishing )
- 20(3), August 2010
(Agility must be good for testing )
- 20(2), June 2010
(People are Approximators, Not Perfectors )
- 20(1), January 2010
(OOP and Programming)
- 19(4), December 2009
(Testing My Building)
- 19(3), August 2009
(Confidentiality and Plagiarism)
- 19(2), May 2009
(Running a Conference Program Meeting in the 21st Century)
- 19(1), March 2009
(Is Software Testing Essential or Accidental?)
- 18(4), December 2008
(Software testing is an elephant )
- 18(3), September 2008
(Science fiction and fantasy)
- 18(1), March 2008
(The journal impact factor)
- 17(4), December 2007
(Why should I review papers?)
- 17(3), September 2007
(Standards for reviewing papers)
- 17(2), June 2007
(Introduction and plans for the future)
- 17(1), March 2007
(Reflections on the past, present and future)
|
Information for the STVR editorial board
|